Does portal vein anatomy influence intrahepatic distribution of metas-tases from colorectal cancer?

Authors

  • Anais Tribolet La Timone Hospital, AP-HM
  • Alexandra Nassar Hopital Cochin, Paris
  • Maxime Barat Hopital Cochin, APHP
  • David Fuks Hopital Cochin, APHP
  • Mathilde Aissaoui Hopital Cochin, APHP
  • Philippe Soyer Hopital Cochin, APHP
  • Ugo Marchese Hopital Cochin, APHP
  • Martin Gaillard Hopital Cochin, APHP
  • Jean Hardwigsen La Timone Hospital, AP-HM
  • Stylianos Tzedakis Hopital Cochin, APHP

Abstract

Purpose: Other than location of the primary colorectal cancer (CRC), a few factors are known to influence the intrahepatic distribution of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). We aimed to assess whether the anatomy of the portal vein (PV) could influence the intrahepatic distribution of CRLM.  

Materials and Methods: Patients with CRLM diagnosed between January 2018 and December 2022 at two tertiary centers were included and imaging was reviewed by two radiologists independently. Intra-operator concordance was assessed according to the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The influence of the diameter, angulation of the portal vein (PV) branches and their variations on the number and distribution of CRLM were compared using Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson’s Chi-square and Spearman’s correlation tests.

Results: Two hundred patients were included. ICC was high (>0.90, P<0.001). Intrahepatic CRLM distribution was right-liver, left-liver unilateral and bilateral in 66 (33%), 24 (12%) and 110 patients (55%), respectively. Median number of CRLM was 3 (1-7). Type 1, 2 and 3 portal vein variations were observed in 156 (78%), 19 (9.5%) and 25 (12%) patients, respectively. CRLM unilateral or bilateral distribution was not influenced by PV anatomical variations (P= 0.13), diameter of the right (P=0.90) or left (P=0.50) PV branches, angulation of the right (P=0.20) or left (P=0.80) PV branches and was independent from primary tumor localisation (P=0.60). No correlations were found between CRLM number and diameter (R: 0.093, P=0.10) or angulation of the PV branches (R: 0.012, P=0.83).

Conclusions: PV anatomy does not seem to influence the distribution and number of CRLM.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-09-09

How to Cite

Tribolet, A., Nassar, A., Barat, M., Fuks, D., Aissaoui, M., Soyer, P., … Tzedakis, S. (2024). Does portal vein anatomy influence intrahepatic distribution of metas-tases from colorectal cancer?. Radiology and Oncology, 58(3), 376–385. Retrieved from https://radioloncol.com/index.php/ro/article/view/4364

Issue

Section

Radiology