Comparison of MR Cytometry Methods in Predicting Immunohistochemical Factor Status and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer

Authors

  • Lei Wu Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, China
  • Fan Liu Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, School of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
  • Sisi Li MR Research Collaboration Team, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Beijing, China
  • Xinyi Luo Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China
  • Yishi Wang MR Research Collaboration Team, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Beijing, China
  • Wen Zhong Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, School of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
  • Thorsten Feiweier MR Research Collaboration Team, Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany
  • Junzhong Xu Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
  • Haihua Bao Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, China
  • Diwei Shi Center for Nano and Micro Mechanics, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
  • Hua Guo Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, School of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

Abstract

Background. First evaluation of the performance of MR cytometry incorporating transcytolemmal water exchange in predicting immunohistochemical factor status and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Materials and methods. 90 breast cancer patients were prospectively enrolled. For each participant, pulsed gradient spin-echo (PGSE) and oscillating gradient spin-echo (OGSE) diffusion-weighted imaging of 25Hz and 50Hz were performed on a 3T MRI scanner. Time-dependent apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and microstructural parameters including cell diameter d, intracellular volume fraction vin, water exchange rate constant kin, and apparent extracellular diffusivity Dex were calculated. Single- and multi-variable logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate their performance in identifying IHC factor status and molecular subtypes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was computed.

Results. The multi-variable regression models generated from MR cytometry-derived metrics provided higher AUC compared to those from time-dependent ADC metrics, i.e. 0.744 vs. 0.645 for ER, 0.727 vs. 0.688 for PR, 0.734 vs.0.623 for HER2, and 0.679 vs. 0.633 for Ki67, 0.751 vs. 0.644 for TNBC, 0.819 vs. 0.765 for HER2-enriched, 0.730 vs.0.659 for Luminal A, 0.633 vs.0.633 for Luminal B. MR cytometry with transcytolemmal water exchange (JOINT and EXCHANGE) outperformed the original one with the impermeable model (IMPULSED) in predicting PR (0.727 vs. 0.705), HER2 (0.734 vs. 0.689), Ki67 (0.679 vs. 0.646), TNBC (0.751 vs. 0.748) and HER2-enriched (0.819 vs. 0.739), Luminal A (0.730 vs. 0.666), Luminal B (0.633 vs. 0.630).

Conclusions. MR cytometry outperformed conventional ADC measurements in clinical breast cancer subtyping. Incorporating transcytolemmal water exchange further enhanced classification accuracy.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-08

How to Cite

Wu, L., Liu, F., Li, S., Luo, X., Wang, Y., Zhong, W., … Guo, H. (2025). Comparison of MR Cytometry Methods in Predicting Immunohistochemical Factor Status and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer. Radiology and Oncology, 59(3), 337–348. Retrieved from https://radioloncol.com/index.php/ro/article/view/4618

Issue

Section

Radiology